Search results for "agri‐environment scheme"

showing 1 items of 1 documents

Improving scientific rigour in conservation evaluations and a plea deal for transparency on potential biases

2020

Abstract The delivery of rigorous and unbiased evidence on the effects of interventions lay at the heart of the scientific method. Here we examine scientific papers evaluating agri‐environment schemes, the principal instrument to mitigate farmland biodiversity declines worldwide. Despite previous warnings about rudimentary study designs in this field, we found that the majority of studies published between 2008 and 2017 still lack robust study designs to strictly evaluate intervention effects. Potential sources of bias that arise from the correlative nature are rarely mentioned, and results are still promoted by using a causal language. This lack of robust study designs likely results from …

0106 biological sciencesagri‐environment schemelcsh:QH1-199.5Psychological interventionIntervention effectlcsh:General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesRigourPleaorganic farmingbefore after control impactVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Basale biofag: 470Ecology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationEcology010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyClinical study designevaluation of conservation interventionsPrincipal (computer security)biodiversity | causal languageRisk analysis (engineering)meta‐analysisMeta-analysisTransparency (graphic)PsychologyConservation Letters
researchProduct